Везде
Following Adam’s road: the problem of restoring of the primordial language in Paracelsian philosophy
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Following Adam’s road: the problem of restoring of the primordial language in Paracelsian philosophy
Annotation
PII
S2072-07260000616-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Anton Karabykov 
Edition
Volume 13 Issue 2
Pages
68-96
Abstract

The goal of the article is to explore the system of beliefs and presumptions underlying the linguo-philosophic and semiotic constructions developed by Paracelsus and his followers as well as their views on the essence and modes of finding of the primordial language. That system and those views are explored in the context of the “Adamistic” studies of the 15th – 17th cc. and of the Paracelsian doctrine as a whole. Special attention is paid to Paracelsus’ interpretation of the biblical stories about the world and the human creation, the original naming and the Fall, since this interpretation elucidates the meaning of the abovementioned constructions. It is argued that in the light of Paracelsianism, the acquisi­tion, as well as the very poiesis of the Ursprache depends directly on one’s proficiency in the art of interpreting the signatures (Kunst signata) implanted by God in natural things. That art the theory of which was developed by Paracelsus on a basis of folk medicine practice played a major role in the “Adamistic” speculations of Paracelsians and marginalized the linguo-philosophic issues. They portrayed Adam as a paradigmatic hermeneutist of the natural world and used the biblical story about the naming of animals and birds (Gen. 2.19‒20) chiefly for legitimizing the doctrine of signatures, which was central to the medicine and natural philosophy of Paracelsus.

The research is supplemented with an abridged translation of the treatise written by the German scholar Wolfgang Ambrosius Fabricius Ἀπόρημα βοτανικόν. De signaturis plan­tarum (1653). That text is devoted to a critical analysis of the Paracelsian doctrine of sig­natures from the position of a moderate Galenism, which dominated in the university medicine of that age.

Keywords
Paracelsus, Emblematic World View, Renaissance Neoplatonism, hermeneu­tics of nature, signatures of things, Genesis, history of science and medicine
Date of publication
01.06.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
694
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Aarsleff, H. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1982. 431 pp.
    2. 

  2. Agrippa ab Netteszheim. De Occulta Philosophia. Libri Tres. Coloniae, 1533. 362 pp.
    3. 

  3. Aristotle. Sochinenija [Works], 4 Vols, ed. by V.F. Asmus. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1976‒1983. (In Russian)
    4. 

  4. Aristotle’s Compleat Master-Piece. Displaying the Secrets of Nature in the Generation of Man. London, 1728. 144 pp.
    5. 

  5. Ashworth, W.B., Jr. “Emblematic Natural History of the Renaissance”, Cultures of Natural His­tory, ed. by N. Jardine, J.A. Secord, E.C. Spary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 17‒38.
    6. 

  6. Augustine. Tvorenija, Vol. 2: Teologicheskije traktaty [Works, Vol. 2: Theological treatises], St. Petersburg: Aleteja Publ.; Kiev: UTSIMM-Press Publ., 2000. 751 pp. (In Russian)
    7. 

  7. Avenarius, J. Liber radicum sive Lexicon hebraicum. Wittenberg: Crato, 1568.
    8. 

  8. Aversa, R. Logica: institutionibus praeviis quaestionibus contexta. Roma: Jacobus Mascardus, 1623. 704 pp.
    9. 

  9. Bacon, F. The Works, Vol. III. London: Longmans & Co, 1870. 836 pp.
    10. 

  10. Bennett, B.C. “Doctrine of Signatures: An Explanation of Medicinal Plant Discovery or Dis­semination of Knowledge?”, Economic Botany, 2007, No. 61 (3), рр. 247‒255.
    11. 

  11. Benzenhӧfer, U. & Gantenbein, U.L. “Paracelsus”, Dictionary of Gnosis & Western Esoteri­cism, ed. by W.J. Hanegraaff. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2006, pp. 922‒931.
    12. 

  12. Bianchi, M.L. Signatura rerum: segni, magia e conoscenza da Paracelso a Leibniz. Roma: Edi­zioni dell’Ateneo, 1987. 199 pp.
    13. 

  13. Buxtorfius, J. Lexicon Hebraicum et Chaldaicum cum brevi Lexico Rabbinico Philosophico. Basilea: Conradus Waldkirchus, 1607.
    14. 

  14. Crollius, O. Basilica chymica: pluribus selectis et secretissimis propria manuali experentia ap­probatis descriptionibus, et usu Remdiorum chymicorum selectissimorum. Genevae: Chouet, 1643. 399 pp.
    15. 

  15. Deodatus, C. Pantheum Hygiasticum Hippocratico-Hermeticum, De Hominis Vita, Ad Centum Et Viginti Annos Salubriter producenda: Libris Tribus Distinctum. Bruntruti: Darbellay, 1628. 954 pp.
    16. 

  16. Ellistone, J. “Preface to the Reader”, Signatura rerum, or, The signature of all things… by Jacob Behmen, aliàs Teutonicus Phylosophus. London: Printed by John Macock for Gyles Calvert, 1651.
    17. 

  17. Fabricius, W.A. AПOPHMA BOTANIKON. De signaturis plantarum. Norimbergae: Wolfg. Endterus, 1653. 38 pp.
    18. 

  18. Gesner, С. Historiae animalium, Lib. I: De quadrupedibus viviparis… Zurich: Tiguri apud Christ. Froschoverum, 1551. 1104 pp.
    19. 

  19. Gesner, С. De rerum fossilium, lapidum et gemmarum maxime, figuris et similitudinibus liber. Zurich: J. Gesner, 1565. 169 pp.
    20. 

  20. Goltz, D. “Naturmystik und Naturwissenschaft in der Medizin um 1600”, Sudhoffs Archiv, 1976, No. 60 (1), pp. 45‒65.
    21. 

  21. Goodrick-Clarke, N. The Western Esoteric Traditions: a Historical Introduction. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. 286 pp.
    22. 

  22. Haage, B.D. “Paracelsus zwischen Spiritualitat und Wissenschaft”, Mystik und Natur. Zur Ge­schichte ihres Verhältnisses vom Altertum bis zur Gegenwart, hrsg. von P. Dinzelbacher. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2009, S. 87‒100.
    23. 

  23. Karabykov, A.V. “‘I narek chelovek imena’: strategii vossozdanija adamicheskogo jazyka v kul­ture renessansa” [‘So the man gave names’: the strategies of reconstitution of the Adamic language in Renaissance culture], Chelovek, 2014, No. 5, pp. 114‒131. (In Russian)
    24. 

  24. Karabykov, A.V. “Jazyk Adama, ieroglifika egipt’an i ‘emlematicheskoje mirovozzrenije’ Ren­essansa” [The Language of Adam, Egyptian Hieroglyphics and the ‘Emblematic World View’ of the Renaissance], Voprosy filosofii, 2016, No. 10, pp. 133‒153. (In Russian)
    25. 

  25. Karabykov, A.V. “Transformazija metafiziki pervozdannogo jazyka v renessansnom kabbal­izme” [The Transformation of the Primordial Language Metaphysics in the Renaissance Cabbalism], Voprosy filosofii, 2016, No. 3, pp. 186‒197. (In Russian)
    26. 

  26. Koyre, A. Mistiki, spiritualisty, alkhimiki Germanii XVI veka [Mystics, spiritualists, alchemists of the 16th century German], trans. by А.М. Rutkevich. Dolgopudnyj: Allegro-Press Publ., 1994. 169 pp. (In Russian)
    27. 

  27. Leibniz, G.W. Sochinenija [Works], Vol. III., ed. by G.G. Majorov and A.L. Subbotin. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1984. 734 pp. (In Russian)
    28. 

  28. Lemnius, L. De miraculis occultis naturae libri IIII. Coloniae Agrippinae: Apud Theodorum Baumium, 1583. 627 pp.
    29. 

  29. Lipomanus, L. Catenae in Genesin: ex authoribus ecclesiaticus plus minus sexaginta. Parisiis: Guillard, 1546.
    30. 

  30. Meier, P. Paracels – vrach I providetz. Razmyshlenija o Teofraste fon Gogengejme [Paracelsus: a doctor and prophet. A reflection on Theophrastus von Hohenheim], trans. by E.B. Murzin. Moscow: Novyj Akropol Publ., 2014. 560 pp. (In Russian)
    31. 

  31. Pagel, W. Paracelsus. An Introduction to Philosophical Medicine in the Era of Renaissance. Basel; München: Karger, 1982. 399 pp.
    32. 

  32. Paracelsus. Aurora Thesaurusque Philosophorum, Theophrasti Paracelsi, Germani Philosophi et Medici cunctis omnibus accuratissimi. Basilieae, 1577. 191 pp.
    33. 

  33. Paracelsus. Sӓmtliche Werke. I Abt. Medizinische, naturwissenschaftliche und philosphische Schriften, 14 Bdn., hrsg. von K. Sudhoff. München; Berlin: K. Oldenbourg, 1922‒1933.
    34. 

  34. Porta, I.B. Magiae naturalis libri viginti. Hanoviae: Typis Wechelianis, 1619. 622 pp.
    35. 

  35. Quercetanus, I. Liber de priscorum philosophorum verae medicinae materia, praeparationis modo, atque in curandis morbis, praestantia. [Genevae]: Thom. Schürer & Barth. Voigt, 1613. 480 pp.
    36. 

  36. Ray, J. Catalogus Plantarum circa Cantabrigiam nascentium. Cantabrigiae: Joann. Field, 1660. 182 pp.
    37. 

  37. Rothstein, M. “Etymology, Genealogy, and the Immutability of Origins”, Renaissance Quar­terly, 1990, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 332‒347.
    38. 

  38. Schӧne, A. Emblematik und Drama im Zeitalter des Barock. München: C.H. Beck, 1993. 248 pp.
    39. 

  39. Sennertus, D. De chymicorum cum Aristotelicis et Galenicis consensu ac dissensu.Wittebergae: Zaharia Shurerus, 1619. 709 pp.
    40. 

  40. Stolzenberg, D. “Universal History of the Characters of Letters and Languages: An Unknown Manuscript by Athanasius Kircher”, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, 2011‒2012, Vol. 56‒57, pp. 305‒321.
    41. 

  41. Temkin, О. Galenism: Rise and Decline of a Medical Philosophy. Ithaca; London: Cornell Uni­versity Press, 1973. 240 pр.
    42. 

  42. Vallesius, F. De iis quae scripta sunt physice in libris sacris, sive de sacra philosophia.Augusta Taurinorum: Haeres Nicolai Beuilaquae, 1587. 656 pp.
    43. 

  43. Vickers, B. “Critical Reactions to the Occult Sciences During the Renaissance”, The Scientific Enterprise, ed. by E. Ullmann-Margalit. Dordrecht: Springer, 1992, pp. 43‒92.
    44.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate