Везде
The constitution as an archaic legal instrument: the problem A. V. Lagutkin, l. Yu. Grudtsina intelligence as a principle, category, task requirement and one of the criteria of legal techniques
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The constitution as an archaic legal instrument: the problem A. V. Lagutkin, l. Yu. Grudtsina intelligence as a principle, category, task requirement and one of the criteria of legal techniques
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000616-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Aleksandr Lagutkin  Lyudmila Yu. Grudtsyna
Edition
Issue 7
Pages
101-105
Abstract
In article an attempt ofjudgment taking into account historical experience of the social, legal and economic nature of the Constitution as the legal instrument of the management having the dual nature issued at the end of the XVIII century is made. On the one hand, historical emergence of the Constitution as legal act is connected with social and economic (structural public) shifts (revolutions) in the developing societies when Constitutions replaced with themselves monarchs and were the tool of society which agreed with the state. On the other hand, evolution of essence of the Constitution for last two centuries almost completely changed its contents when not society dictates to the state the terms, and the state by means of the Constitution establishes these or those requirements, obligations, legal borders for society. From the subject of management society turns in object, and the state which was once acting as object of management becomes subject of management. In this regard, according to authors of article to have to think of suitability of the instrument of management (Constitution) to the changing realities.
Keywords
constitution, state, civil society, monarchy, bourgeoisie, revolution, middle class, law
Date of publication
01.07.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1204
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Bazhanov E.P., Bazhanova N.E. Mnogopolyusnyj mir. M., 2010 
 
 2. Bazhanov E.P., Bazhanova N.E. Kuda idet chelovechestvo?//Nauch.-analit. zhurnal “Obozrevatel' -Observer”. 2009. № 9 (236). S. 6-15 
 
 3. Al'bov A.P. Filosofiya i istoriya prava Novgorodtseva//Novgorodtsev P.I. Kant i Gegel' v ikh uchenii o prave i gosudarstve. SPb., 2000. 
 
 4. Grebennikov V.V., Marchuk N.N. Mnogonatsional'nost' i mul'tikul'turalizm v sudebnoj vlasti v Bolivii v kolonial'nyj period//Istoriya, filosofiya, ehkonomika i pravo. 2014. № 4. 
 
 5. Ivanova S.A. Chastnopravovye otnosheniya i razvitie grazhdanskogo obschestva v sovremennoj Rossii//Vestnik MGPU. Ser. “Yuridicheskie nauki”. 2014. № 4.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate