Везде
HOW TO PROTECT THE RESULTS OF INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
HOW TO PROTECT THE RESULTS OF INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY
Annotation
PII
S086904990000616-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexander Kurdin  Anastasia Komkova Andrey Shastitko
Edition
Issue 2
Pages
17-33
Abstract
The problems of protection of intellectual property, especially software from unauthorized copying in developing countries are analyzed. The task of identifi cation the features of intellectual activity as a special benefit, assess the extent of counterfeiting in the software and the comparative advantages of the various remedies – technical, legal, and moral values are considered. Different variants of these methods, the relationship between the protection of intellectual property are represented.
Keywords
intellectual property, intellectual product, the results of intellectual activity, software, intellectual property protection
Date of publication
03.03.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1003
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Kasperskij E. “Ya stanu № 1 v mire!” / / Territoriya biznesa. 2008. № 5 (http://www. t6-magazine.ru/archive/20/subject/kaspersky/).
 Shastitko A.E. Konkurentosposobnost' regiona: soderzhanie, faktory, politika / / Baltijskij region. 2009. № 1.
 Shastitko A.E. Teoriya i praktika sbalansirovannosti instrumentov ehkonomicheskoj politiki (Ctoit li zaschischat' konkurentsiyu ot intellektual'noj sobstvennosti?) // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2013. № 8.
 Arrow K. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention // The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton, 1962.
 Business Software Association (BSA) Shadow Market. 2011 BSA Global Software Piracy Study. BSA. 2012.
 Campbell-Kelly M. Development and Structure of the International Software Industry, 1950– 1990 // Business and Economic History. 1995. Vol. 24. № 2.
 Cohen W., Nelson R., Walsh J. Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not) // NBER Working Paper. 2000. № w7552.
 The Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property. 2013. The IP Commission Report (http://ipcommission.org/report/IP_Commission_ Report_052213.pdf).
 Conner K.R., Rumelt R.P. Software Piracy: an Analysis of Protection Strategies // Management Science. 1991. № 37.
 Dasgupta P., David P. Information Disclosure and the Economics of Science and Technology // Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory. New York, 1987.
 Dasgupta P., David P. Toward a New Economics of Science // Research Policy. 1994. № 23.
 Ellickson R. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Harvard, 1991.
 Fauchart E., Hippel E. von. Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: the Case of French Chefs // MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper 4576–06. January. 2006.
 George K., Joll C., Lynk E. Industrial Organization: Competition, Growth and Structural Change. London, 1992.
 Hackman J. Group Influ ences on Individuals. Chapter 33 / / Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago, 1976.
 Levin R., Klevorick A., Nelson R., Winter S. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development // Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1987. № 3.
 Longe O.B. Intellectual Property Protection in the Age of Open Access and Digital Rights Management Balancing the Odds (http://www.ais.up.ac.za/digi /docs/longe_paper.pdf (2009)) Lu Y., Poddar S. Accommodation or Deterrence in the Face of Commercial Piracy: the Impact of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Protection // CEMA Working Papers 389. 2009.
 Mansfield E. Patents and Innovation: an Empirical Study // Management Science. 1986. № 32.
 O’Mahony S. Guarding the Commons: how Open source Contributors Protect their Work // Rsearch Policy. 2003. Vol. 32. № 7.
 Ostrom E. Governing the Commons. Cambridge, 1990.
 Picot A., Fiedler M. Impacts of DRM on Internet Based Innovation // Digital Rights Management: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2003. Vol. 2770.
 Rai A. Regulating Scientifi c Research: Intellectual Property Rights and the Norms of Science // Northwestern University Law Review. 1999. Vol. 94. № 1 (Fall).
 Samuelson P. DRM {and, or, vs.} the Law // Communications of the ACM. 2003. Vol. 46. № 4.
 Sundararajan A. Managing Digital Piracy: Pricing, Protection and Welfare // Center for Digital Economy Research, Stern School of Business, Working Paper. 2003. № IS-03–05.
 Svensson M., Larsson S. Social Norms and Intellectual Property: Online Norms and the European Legal Development // Lund University Research Report in Sociology of Law. 2009. № 1.
 Tyler T. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, 1990.
 Ünlü V., Hess T. The Optimal Level of Technical Copyright Protection: a Game-theoretic Approach // Institute of Information Systems and New Media at the Munich School of Management, Working Paper. 2003. № 9–2003.
 Välimäki M., Oksanen V. DRM Interoperability and Intellectual Property Policy in Europe // European Intellectual Property Review. 2006. Vol. 26. № 11.
 World Economic Forum, INSEAD. The Global Information Technology Report 2012. Living in a Hyperconnected World.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate