Везде
Artificial sociality in the human-machine interaction
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Artificial sociality in the human-machine interaction
Annotation
PII
S0321-50750000621-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. Krasko  V. Tumalavičius J. Lonska V. Komarova
Edition
Volume 21 Vol 21, No 2 (2021)
Pages
377-390
Abstract

The article aims at clarifying the concept ‘artificial sociality’ in the human-machine interaction by answering the question whether artificial sociality is a prerequisite or a result of this interaction. The authors conducted a logical analysis of the definitions of sociality and artificial sociality as presented in the scientific literature, and conducted an empirical study of artificial sociality in the human-machine interaction with three methods - comparison of means, correlation analysis and discriminant analysis. All three methods were used in the analysis of the same data: indicators of the potential of the human-machine interaction and G. Hofstede’s six cultural dimensions. With these measurements of culture, the authors interpreted empirically the degree of its ‘artificiality’ (based on the methodological assumption about the combination of ‘natural’ and ‘artificial’ in culture) which determines the development of artificial sociality. Based on the results of the application of three methods of statistical analysis, the authors conclude that in the contemporary world, there are both conditionally ‘artificial’ cultures that are the most favourable for the development of artificial (algorithmic) sociality and conditionally ‘natural’ cultures that hinder the development of artificial sociality. This type of sociality emerged under the development of writing and various methods of processing and storing information (catalogues, archives, etc.), i.e., long before the creation of machines. Artificial sociality is determined by the relative ‘artificiality’ of culture, and is a prerequisite rather than a result of the human-machine interaction.

Keywords
artificial sociality, human-machine interaction, G. Hofstede’s cultural dimension, comparison of means, correlation analysis, discriminant analysis
Date of publication
30.06.2021
Number of purchasers
6
Views
142
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Antinazi A. Sociabelnost [Sociability]. Entsiklopediya sociologii. URL: http://sociology.niv.ru/ doc/encyclopedia/socio/fc/slovar-209-2.htm#zag-3769. (In Russ.).
  2. Castelfranchi C. Guaranties for autonomy in cognitive agent architecture. Woolridge M., Jennings N. (Eds.). Intelligent Agents I. Berlin; 1995.
  3. Castelfranchi C. Individual social action. Holmstrom-Hintikka G., Tuomela R. (Eds.). Contemporary Action Theory. Vol. 2: Social Action. Springer; 1997.
  4. Castelfranchi C. Modelling social action for AI agents. Artificial Intelligence. 1998; 103 (1-2).
  5. Coelho D. A study on the relation between manufacturing strategy, company size, country culture and product and process innovation in Europe. International Journal of Business and Globalisation. 2011; 7 (2).
  6. Currie D., Smith C., Jagals P. The application of system dynamics modelling to environmental health decision-making and policy - a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18.
  7. Elsukov A. Sotsiologija [Sociology]. Minsk; 2014. (In Russ.).
  8. Fischer K., Florian M., Malsch T. (Eds.). Socionics: Scalability of Complex Social Systems. Berlin-Heidelberg; 2005.
  9. Harari Y. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Harvill Secker; 2016.
  10. Harari Y. 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. Spiegel & Grau; 2018.
  11. Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions and Organizations Across Countries. Thousand Oaks; 2001.
  12. Hofstede G. 6 dimensions for website.xls. Dimension Data Matrix. URL: https://geerthofstede.com/research-and-vsm/dimension-data-matrix.
  13. Hofstede G. Dimensions of National Culture. URL: https://hi.hofstede-insights.com/ national-culture.
  14. Hofstede G.J. Artificial Sociality: Simulating the Social Mind. URL: https://geerthofstede.com/ wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Oratieboekje_Hofstede_Artif-Sociality-2019-01-17.pdf.
  15. Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J, Minkov M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw Hill Professional; 2010.
  16. Kamenets A. Kulturologiya russkogo mira: dukhovnye osnovy natsionalnogo mentaliteta [Culturology of the Russian World: Spiritual Foundations of the National Mentality]. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.).
  17. Kazinik M. Shkola Nobelevskih laureatov [School of Nobel laureates]. URL: http://kazinik.ru/ documents/d8eaeeebe0_cdeee1e5ebe5e2f1eae8f5_ebe0f3f0e5e0f2ee.html. (In Russ.).
  18. Krasavin I. Fraktalnaya istoriya [Fractal Story]. Moscow; 2015. (In Russ.).
  19. Lebedev S. Belgorod - gorod “kumovstva” i “svjazej” [Belgorod is a city of “nepotism” and “connections”]. URL: https://fonar.tv/article/2019/03/15/belgorod-gorod-kumovstva-i-svyazey-sociolog-sergey-lebedev-o-populyarnyh-belgorodskih-stereotipah. (In Russ.).
  20. Luhmann N. Social Systems. Palo Alto; 1995.
  21. Luhmann N. Introduction to Systems Theory. Polity Press; 2013.
  22. Malsch T. (Ed.) Sozionik - Soziologische Ansichten uber kunstliche Sozialitat. Berlin; 1998.
  23. Malsch T. Naming the unnamble: Socionics or the sociological turn of/to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 2001; 4 (3).
  24. McKelvie D. Modelling Social Care Complexity: The Potential of System Dynamics. London; 2013.
  25. Menshikov V., Kokina I., Komarova V., Korshenkov E. Human-machine collaboration as a factor of labour productivity and efficiency. European Scientific Journal. 2020; 16 (13).
  26. Ottmann K. The Essential Mark Rothko. New York; 2003.
  27. Rezaev A., Starikov V., Tregubova N. Sociologija v epohu “iskusstvennoj sotsialnosti”: poisk novyh osnovanij [Sociology in the era of “artificial sociality”: The search for new foundations]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovanija. 2020; 2. (In Russ.).
  28. Rezaev A., Tregubova N. Are sociologists ready for ‘artificial sociality’? Current issues and future prospects for studying artificial intelligence in social sciences. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2018; 5.
  29. Rezaev A., Tregubova N. “Iskusstvenny intellekt”, “onlain-kultura”, “iskusstvennaja sotsialnost'”: opredelenie ponjatij [‘Artificial intelligence’, ‘online culture’, ‘artificial sociality’: Definition of the terms]. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2019; 6. (In Russ.).
  30. Rezaev A., Tregubova N., Starikov V. Sociological considerations on human-machine interactions: From artificial intelligence to artificial sociality. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industry, Business and Social Sciences. URL: https://pureportal.spbu.ru/en/ publications/sociological-considerations-on-human-machine-interactions-from-ar.
  31. Sweet S., Grace-Martin K. Data Analysis with SPSS: A First Course in Applied Statistics. Pearson; 2012.
  32. Tavokin E. Iskusstvennost “iskusstvennoj sotsia'nosti” [The artificiality of ‘artificial sociality’]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovanija. 2019; 6. (In Russ.).
  33. University of Surrey: Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. URL: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS.html.
  34. World Economic Forum. The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. Schwab K. (Ed.). Geneva; 2019.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate