Везде
Complex concepts with varying connotations: In search for conceptual definitions
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Complex concepts with varying connotations: In search for conceptual definitions
Annotation
PII
S0321-50750000621-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Irina Trotsuk 
Edition
Volume 21 Vol 21, No 2 (2021)
Pages
365-376
Abstract

One of the fundamental challenges for sociology is the interpretation of its key terms, which is determined by the fact that many words of everyday language and scientific discourse are the same despite implying a much higher level of generalization as sociological categories. Certainly, such challenges are more typical for the empirical research - when sociologists turn their theoretical concepts into sets of empirical indicators which have to be clear enough for the respondent to understand and answer the questionnaire and for the sociologist to interpret these answers correctly. Nevertheless, the lack of generally recognized conceptual definitions is no less important, because the general picture of social reality is necessarily made of them (the society is described as either fair, consisting of trustworthy institutions that provide opportunities for being happy, or in the opposite statements). The article presents a possible reconstruction of the strategy that sociologists use in the search for conceptual definitions for such complex concepts with varying connotations as love, happiness, trust and justice. This strategy consists of two steps: focus on the macro-sociological dimension of the phenomena under study as determining its various manifestations and everyday interpretations (the key step in the study of love and happiness); and identification of objective and subjective indicators of the phenomenon under study (the key step in the study of trust and justice). For instance, in the study of love and happiness, there is the obvious micro-sociological perspective that implies personal responsibility for being happy and loved, and the hidden macro-sociological perspective that implies social standards for identifying and achieving love and happiness; trust is defined as a source of social order, cooperation, institutional, organizational and everyday interactions, which reduces the level of uncertainty; in the searches for the conceptual definition of justice, there are two main approaches - the first approach considers justice as one of many grounds for developing some theoretical model; the second approach reconstructs justice either as an ‘ideal’ political-philosophical model of social order or as a ‘means’ of the comparative analysis of its practical implementations.

Keywords
complex concepts, varying connotations, conceptual definitions, love, happiness and (social) well-being, (social) trust, (social) justice, expert knowledge, social order
Date of publication
30.06.2021
Number of purchasers
6
Views
144
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Argyle M. The Psychology of Happiness. Saint Petersburg; 2003. (In Russ.).
  2. Bachmann R. At the crossroads: Future directions in trust research. Journal of Trust Research. 2011; 1.
  3. Bauman Z. The Individualized Society. Malden; 2000.
  4. Bauman Z. Sociological enlightenment - for whom, about what? Theory, Culture & Society. 2000; 17 (2).
  5. Beck U. Risk Society: Towards A New Modernity. London; 1992.
  6. Better Life Index. URL: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/ru/#/11111111111.
  7. Brugger P. Trust as a discourse: Concept and measurement strategy. Journal of Trust Research. 2015; 5 (1).
  8. Chepurnykh M.N. Happiness indexes: Western experience (a sociological review). URL: http://www.teoria-practica.ru/-9-2012/sociology/chepurnykh.pdf. (In Russ.).
  9. Coleman J.S. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge; 1990.
  10. Doyle A. Trust, citizenship and exclusion in the risk society. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.610.6331&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  11. Driver M. How trust functions in the context of identity work. Human Relations. 2015; 68 (6).
  12. Easterlin R. Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal. 2001; III.
  13. Easterlin R. Will raising the income of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 1995; 27.
  14. Elster J. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.).
  15. Flint J., Powell R. Individualization and social dis/integration in contemporary society: A comparative note on Zygmunt Bauman and Norbert Elias. F. Dépelteau, T.S. Landini (Eds.). Norbert Elias and Social Theory. New York; 2013.
  16. Gambetta D. (Ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. New York; 1988.
  17. Giddens A. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge; 1991.
  18. Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge; 1990.
  19. Gorlizki Y. Structures of trust after Stalin. Slavonic and East European Review. 2013; 91 (1).
  20. Govier T. Social Trust and Human Communities. Montreal-London; 1997.
  21. Gudkov L. Trust in Russia: Meaning, Functions, Structure. Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.).
  22. Habermas J. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge; 1990.
  23. Hosking G. Trust: A History. Oxford; 2014.
  24. Human Development Report. URL: http://hdr.undp.org/en.
  25. Illouz E. Why Love Hurts. A Sociological Explanation. Polity Press; 2016.
  26. Jalava J. Trust as a Decision. The Problems and Functions of Trust in Luhmannian Systems Theory. Helsinki; 2006.
  27. Kuchenkova A.V. Interpersonal trust in the Russian society. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2016; 1. (In Russ.).
  28. Lane C., Bachmann R. Trust Between and Within Organizations. Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applications. New York; 1998.
  29. Layard R. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. Moscow; 2012. (In Russ.).
  30. Levi M. Sociology of Trust. Seattle; 2015.
  31. Luhmann N. Trust and Power. Chichester; 1979.
  32. Misztal B.A. Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge; 1996.
  33. Morris I. Foragers, Farmers, and Fossil Fuels: How Human Values Evolve. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).
  34. Nannestad P. What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything? Annual Review of Political Science. 2008; 11.
  35. Nichols T. The Death of Expertise. The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. New York; 2017.
  36. Osin E.N., Leontiev D.A. Testing of the Russian-language versions of two scales for the express-assessment of subjective well-being. Materialy III Vserossiyskogo sotsiologicheskogo congressa. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.).
  37. Papakostas A. Civilizing the Public Sphere: Distrust, Trust and Corruption. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.).
  38. Polanyi K. The Great Transformation. Boston; 1944.
  39. Prodi P. A History of Justice: From the Pluralism of Forums to the Modern Dualism of Conscience and Law. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).
  40. Putnam R.P. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York; 2000.
  41. Riggs F.W. The importance of concepts: Some considerations on how they might be designated less ambiguously. American Sociologist. 1979; 14 (4).
  42. Rodionova L.A. Methodological aspects of measuring and modeling the level of happiness. Economika. Upravlenie. Pravo. 2012; 6. (In Russ.).
  43. Rothstein B. The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago-London; 2011.
  44. Rozanov V.V. The Purpose of Human Life. Moscow; 2001. (In Russ.).
  45. Sasaki M., Davydenko V.A., Romashkina G.F., Voronov V.V. Comparative analysis of trust in different countries. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2013; 3. (In Russ.).
  46. Seligman M.E.P. New Positive Psychology: A Scientific View of Happiness and Meaning of Life. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.).
  47. Sen A. The Idea of Justice. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.).
  48. Shmatova Yu.E., Morev M.V. Measuring the level of happiness: A review of Russian and foreign studies. Ekonomicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny: Fakty, Tendentsii, Prognoz. 2015; 3. (In Russ.).
  49. Singh T.B. A social interactions perspective on trust and its determinants. Journal of Trust Research. 2012; 2 (2).
  50. Sztompka P. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge; 1999.
  51. Tabet S. Interview with Zygmunt Bauman: From the modern project to the liquid world. Theory, Culture & Society. 2017; 34 (7-8).
  52. Trotsuk I.V. All power to the experts? Contradictions of the information society as both depending on and devaluating expertise. Russian Sociological Review. 2021; 20 (1).
  53. Trotsuk I.V. Some features of an inspiring book; or why sociologists should study love despite its intangibility. Russian Sociological Review. 2017; 16 (4).
  54. Trotsuk I.V. Justice in sociological discourse: Semantic, empirical, historical, and conceptual challenges. Russian Sociological Review. 2019; 18 (1). (In Russ.).
  55. Trotsuk I.V., Grebneva V.E. Possibilities and limitations of the key methodological approaches to the study of happiness. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 18: Sotsiologiya i Politologiya. 2019; 25 (3). (In Russ.).
  56. Trotsuk I.V., Koroleva K.I. Subjective well-being - quality of life or happiness? Gumanitarnye, Sotsialno-Ekonomicheskie i Obshchestvennye Nauki. 2020; 9. (In Russ.).
  57. Trotsuk I.V., Savelieva E.A. Comparative studies of value orientations: Potential, limitations, and the logic of development. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2015; 4. (In Russ.).
  58. Tyler T.R. Trust and democratic government. V. Braithwaite, M. Levi (Eds.). Trust and Governance. New York; 1998.
  59. Uslaner E. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge University Press; 2002.
  60. Well-Being Index. URL: https://news.gallup.com/topic/well_being_index.aspx.
  61. World Happiness Report. URL: http://worldhappiness.report.
  62. Yamagishi T., Yamagishi M. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion. 1994; 18.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate