On the parataxis and the hypotaxis: the structural contrarity of early and later cultures (from the example of antiquity)
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
On the parataxis and the hypotaxis: the structural contrarity of early and later cultures (from the example of antiquity)
Annotation
PII
S023620070002344-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Andrey Shipilov 
Occupation: Professor, Department of Philosophy, Economics, and Social and Humanitarian Disciplines, Voronezh State Pedagogical University
Affiliation:
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Pages
45-53
Abstract

By the case of Antiquity it is shown that the culture of a primitive society is a sum in structure while the culture of a developed society is a system. The first one is organized by the principle of coordination, while the latter — by the principle of subordination; the early culture is additive, the late one is hierarchical. These characteristics are inherent to the mythology, the religion, the language, the literature, the science, the art and social consciousness as well as to the social organization as a whole

Keywords
antiquity, society, culture, coordination, subordination, additivity, hierarchic
Received
19.09.2018
Date of publication
07.12.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
1476
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Ado P. Plotin, ili Prostota vzglyada. M., 1991.

2. Apollodor. Mifologicheskaya biblioteka. M., 1993.

3. Aristotel'. Sochineniya v 44kh t. T. 4. M., 1983.

4. Katon, Varron, Kolumella, Plinij. O sel'skom khozyajstve. M.–L., 1937.

5. Pindar, Vakkhilid. Ody. Fragmenty. M., 1980.

6. Polemon Periehget. Fragmenty // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1983. № 3.

7. Polibij. Vseobschaya istoriya. I. SPb., 1994.

8. Prokl. Pervoosnovy teologii. M., 1993.

9. Fejerabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki. M., 1986.

10. Shipilov A.V. Neistoriya. M: Progress4Traditsiya, 2012.

11. Snell B. The Discovery of the Mind. N.Y., 1982.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate