Везде
“We - Them” opposition as a basic mechanism of National and cultural identity building
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
“We - Them” opposition as a basic mechanism of National and cultural identity building
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000616-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. Markov 
Edition
Issue 4
Pages
23-35
Abstract
The universal mechanisms of association and dissociation acting as a deep modification of binary cultural oppositions are analyzed. Figurative and symbolical modifications in the stereotypes of national consciousness of “insiders - outsiders” opposition are revealed; the constructive opportunities and destructive potential of “insiders” and “outsiders” symbolism are shown. The causes of cross-cultural (interethnic, interfaith) conflicts are discribed. The system of requisites and factors to prevent and minimize destructive modes of “We - Them” opposition in the contemporary society is offered.
Keywords
NATIONAL AND CULTURAL IDENTITY, "THE ENEMY IMAGE", IDENTITY CRISIS, OUTSIDERS" OPPOSITION, BINARY OPPOSITIONS, MECHANISMS OF ASSOCIATION AND DISSOCIATION, "INSIDERS
Date of publication
01.08.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1236
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Bakhtin M.M. K voprosam metodologii ehstetiki slovesnogo tvorchestva//Sobr. soch.: v 7 t. T 1. M.: Rus. slovari; Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2003. S. 282.
    2. 

  2. Berdyaev N.A. Sud'ba Rossii. M.: Sov. pisatel', 1990. S. 170.
    3. 

  3. Garanyan N.G.Perfektsionizm i vrazhdebnost' kak lichnostnye faktory depressivnykh i trevozhnykh rasstrojstv: Avtoref. dis.. d-ra psikhol. nauk. M.: NII psikhiatrii, 2010.
    4. 

  4. Gusejnov A.A. Dialog kul'tur: predely kul'turologicheskogo analiza//Dialog kul'tur v usloviyakh globalizatsii: XI Mezhdunarodnye Likhachevskie nauchnye chteniya, 12-13 maya 2011 goda: v 2 t. T 1. Doklady. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGUP, 2011. S. 63.
    5. 

  5. Gusejnov A.A. “Svoi” i “chuzhie” v globaliziruyuschemsya mire//Dialog kul'tur i partnerstvo tsivilizatsij: XIV Mezhdunarodnye Likhachevskie nauchnye chteniya, 15-16 maya 2014 goda: v 2 t. T 1. Doklady. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGUP, 2014. S. 56.
    6. 

  6. Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera. SPb.: Iskusstvo, 2000. S. 267.
    7. 

  7. Lotman Yu.M., Uspenskij B.A. Rol' dual'nykh modelej v dinamike russkoj kul'tury (do kontsa XVIII veka)//Uspenskij B.A. Izbr. tr.: v 3 t. T 1. M.: Gnozis, 1994. S. 219-253.
    8. 

  8. Porshnev B.F. O nachale chelovecheskoj istorii: Problemy paleopsikhologii. M.: Mysl', 1974.
    9. 

  9. Prepodobnyj Iustin (Popovich). Filosofskie propasti. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: Izdat. sovet RPTs, 2005.
    10. 

  10. Solov'ev V.S. Russkaya ideya//Russkaya ideya. M.: Respublika, 1992. S. 187.
    11. 

  11. Solov'ev Vl. Opravdanie dobra: Nravstvennaya filosofiya. M.: Respublika, 1996. S. 110.
    12. 

  12. Florenskij P. Avtoreferat. Mirovozzrenie//Soch.: v 4 t. T 1. M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 39.
    13. 

  13. Chereshnev V.A., Rastorguev V.N. Tsivilizatsionnyj krizis: Otsenka situatsii i zadachi antikrizisnoj politiki//Dialog kul'tur i partnerstvo tsivilizatsij: IX Mezhdunarodnye Likhachevskie chteniya. 14-15 maya 2009 goda. SPb.: Iz-vo SPbGUP, 2009. S. 155.
    14.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate