Везде
The origins of morality in archaic society. Based on Iliad
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The origins of morality in archaic society. Based on Iliad
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000616-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
R. Apressyan 
Edition
Issue 4
Pages
21-39
Abstract
The origins of morality, understood as not causing unnecessary harm, justice, benevolence, cooperation, friendly and careful support, and opposite actions are considered at the level of behavioral and communicative practices of the archaic society. Morality as a mode of regulation universally significant actions formed in the process of reflection on particular personal, communicative and communal experience and its further normative generalization. The analysis subject matter are plot lines in the Iliad - the dynamics of relations between Achilles and Agamemnon (from confrontation to reconciliation), and between Achilles and the Trojans in the persons of Hector and Priam (from hatred to indulgence and care).
Keywords
GENEALOGY OF MORALITY, RECIPROCITY, RETRIBUTION, GOLDEN RULE, HOMER, ACHILLES, HECTOR, PRIAM
Date of publication
01.08.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1073
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Sr. neustannye vzaimnye usiliya troyantsev i akhejtsev otomstit' za pavshikh soratnikov v: Il. KhIII: 384, 402, 414, 446. 
 2. Bassett S. AchillesTreatment of Hector's Body//Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. 1933. Vol. 64. P. 46. 
 3. Seaford R. Introduction//Reciprocity in Ancient Greece/Eds. C.G. Normann, P. Waite, R. Seaford. Oxford: Univ. Press, 1998. P. 3.
 4. Harries B. 'Strange Meeting': Diomedes and Glaucus in 'Iliad6//Greece -Rome: Second Series. 1993. Vol. 40, № 2. P. 142. 
 5. Calder W.M., III. Gold for Bronze: Iliad 6.232-36//Studies Presented to Sterling Dow on his eightieth birthday/Ed. A.L. Boegehold. Durham: Duke University, 1984 (GRBS Monograph 10). R. 34. 
 6. Donlan W. The Unequal Exchange between Glaucus and Diomedes in Light of the Homeric GiftEconomy//Phoenix. 1989. Vol. 43. № 1. R. 3 
 7. Chelovek № 4 
 8. Wilson D.F. Ransom, Revenge, and Heroic Identity in the Iliad. Camb.: Univ. Press, 2002. P. 28. 
 9. Macleod C.W. Homer, Iliad, Book 24. Camb.: Univ. Press, 1982 
 10. Griffin J. The Poetry is in the Pity//The Classical Review, New Series. 1983. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 5. 
 11. Losev A.F. Gomer. M.: Uchpedgiz, 1960. S. 97. 
 12. Postlethwaite N. Akhilleus and Agamemnon: Generalized Reciprocity//Reciprocity in Ancient Greece/Ed. C.G. Norman, P. Waite, R. Seaford. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1998. R. 93-94. 
 13. Yan H.K.T. Morality and Virtue in Poetry and Philosophy: A Reading of Homer's Iliad XXIV//Humanitas. 2003. Vol. 16. № 1. P. 24. 
 14. Aristotel'. Nikomakhova ehtika, 1158a, 1/Per. N.V. Braginskoj//Aristotel'. Soch. v 4 t. T. 4. M.: Mysl', 1984. S. 227
 15. Zanker G. Beyond Reciprocity: The Akhilleus-Priam Scene in Iliad 24//Reciprocity in Ancient Greece. R. 73 
 16. Postlethwaite N. Akhilleus and Agamemnon: Generalized Reciprocity. P. 105-126 
 17. Donlan W. Reciprocities in Homer//The Classical World. 1982. Vol. 75. № 3. P. 137-175. 
 18. Aristotel'. Ritorika, 1366a 33-34 Per. s grech. N. Platonovoj, sveren O.V. Smykoj//Antichnye ritoriki. M.: MGU, 1978. S. 43 
 19. Gusejnov A.A. Vvedenie v ehtiku. M.: MGU, 1985. S. 44. 
 20. Apresyan R.G. Kommunikativnyj istochnik moral'nogo dolzhenstvovaniya//Ehticheskaya mysl'. Vyp. 11/Pod red. A.A. Gusejnova. M.: IFRAN, 2011.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate