The other-dimensional person in the situation of cultural other-worldness
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The other-dimensional person in the situation of cultural other-worldness
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000616-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
57-69
Abstract
Under the liberal freedom, the muitldlmenslonailty began to mean the immensity or immeasurableness of the person’s ideas of himself/herself. That has resulted in the person’s other-worldness to both traditional culture and himself/herself. In the current socio-cultural situation one faces the other-dimensionality of the classics and the other-worldness of their consumers, that is the isolation of the younger generation from the world of classical culture and tradition. The education system today should reveal the domains of the culture which are strange for our contemporaries, i.e. became other-dimensional (or other-worldly) for them and to create the other-dimensional person. The category of the other-dimensionality enables us to integrate divergent vectors of culture building activities, promoting thereby creative activity of the youth.
Keywords
INNER AND OUTSIDE WORLD, MEASURE, HARMONY, CULTURAL DIALECTICS, UNIVERSAL METAPHOR, OTHER-WORLDNESS INOMIRNOST, OTHER-DIMENSIONALITY
Date of publication
01.02.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
1094
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Aristotel'. O dushe // Aristotel'. Soch.: v 4 t. T 1. M.: Mysl', 1976.
  2. Artem'eva T.A., Mikeshin M.I. "Nechelovecheskoe" kak literaturnaya real'nost' i vyzov obschestvu // Chelovek. 2012. № 5.
  3. Bodrijyar Zh.Simvolicheskij obmen i smert'. M.: Dobrosvet, 2000.
  4. Gegel' G.V.F. Iz filosofskoj propedevtiki // Ehstetika: v 4 t. T 4. M.: Iskusstvo, 1973.
  5. Delez Zh.Tajna Ariadny // Vopr. filosofii. 1993. № 4.
  6. Kalashnikov M., Rusov R. Sverkhchelovek govorit po-russki. M.: AST; Astrel', 2006.
  7. Kassirer Eh. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form: v 3 t. T 1. Yazyk. M.: SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2002.
  8. Markuze G. Ehros i tsivilizatsiya. Odnomernyj chelovek: Issledovanie ideologii razvitogo industrial'nogo obschestva. M.: AST, 2002.
  9. Mikeshina L.A. Sovremennaya ehpistemologiya gumanitarnogo znaniya: mezhdistsiplinarnye sintezy. M.: Politicheskaya ehntsiklopediya, 2016.
  10. Muzil' R. Chelovek bez svojstv: v 2 t. T 1. M.: Ladomir, 1994.
  11. Pelipenko A.A. Zakat logotsentrizma // Chelovek. 2005. № 5.
  12. Petrov M.K. Ehklektika // Filosofskaya ehntsiklopediya. T 5. M., 1970.
  13. Stepin V.S. U istokov sovremennoj filosofii nauki // Vopr. filosofii. 2004. № 1.
  14. Trunov D.G. Kul'tura kak inomir // URL: http://superinf.ru/view_ helpstud.php?id=3920 (data obrascheniya: 24.10.2015).
  15. Fortunatova V.A., Valeeva E.V. Odnomernyj chelovek v mnogomernoj gumanitaristike: (problemy i puti ikh resheniya v sovremennom obrazovanii) // Vopr. kul'turologii. 2014. № 8.
  16. Frejd Z. Po tu storonu printsipa naslazhdeniya. Ya i Ono. Neudovletvorennost' kul'turoj. SPb.: Aletejya, 1998.
  17. Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i poslednij chelovek. M.: AST, 2004.
  18. Khehtcher U. Ehtika autentichnykh otnoshenij / Mezhdunarodnyj obrazovatel'nyj proekt Aksios. SPb.: Edinenie, 1999.
  19. Shichanina Yu.V. Fenomen inomernosti v sovremennoj kul'ture: (filosofsko-kul'turologicheskij analiz). Rostov n/Donu, 2004.
  20. Shou B. Chelovek i Sverkhchelovek // Poln. sobranie p'es: v 6 t. T 2. L.: Iskusstvo, 1979.
  21. Ehko U. Srednie veka uzhe nachalis' // Inostrannaya literatura. 1994. № 4.
  22. Ehngus U. Mir Charl'za Dikkensa. M.: Progress, 1970.
  23. Ehpshtejn M.N. Konstruktivnyj potentsial gumanitarnykh nauk: mogut li oni izmenyat' to, chto izuchayut? // Filosofskie nauki. 2008

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate