The Human and Myth: aspects of constructive understanding
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The Human and Myth: aspects of constructive understanding
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000392-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
5-21
Abstract
The attempt is made to discover the constructive meaning of myth. The starting point of the reasoning is the interpretation of myth as the primordial legend. Subjective understanding of myth as a product of consciousness and a system of representations is criticized. Instead of it, the constructive understanding is put forward. According to such an understanding consciousness, representations and human reality are themselves the product of myth. The essential features of the myth that are revealed by this constructive understanding are considered. Those features are independence from the consciousness, primordiality, arche, causality, historicity - in their mythological specificity.
Keywords
MYTH, LOGOS, ARCHETYPE, HUMAN REALITY, CAUSALITY, TRANSCENDENCE AND IMMANENCE OF MYTH, PRIME-EVENT, CONSTRUCTIVITY OF MYTH, ARCHE
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1206
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Aristotel'. Fizika // Aristotel'. Sochineniya. V 4-kh t. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 1981. S. 87-88.
  2. Baryshkov V.P. Aksiologiya lichnostnogo bytiya. M.: Logos, 2005. S. 163.
  3. Bibikhin V.V. Rannij Khajdegger: Materialy k seminaru. M.: Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy, 2009. S. 13.
  4. Bulgakov S.N.Svet nevechernij // Bulgakov S.N. Pervoobraz i obraz: sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. SPb. OOO "INAPRESS", M.: Iskusstvo, 1999. S. 76.
  5. Bulgakov S.N.Filosofiya imeni. Parizh: YMCA-Press, 1953. S. 32.
  6. Gadamer G.-G.Prometej i tragediya kul'tury // Gadamer G.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991. S. 242.
  7. Dugin A.G.V poiskakh temnogo Logosa (filosofsko-bogoslovskie ocherki). M.: Akademicheskij Proekt, 2013. S. 483.
  8. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma // Kant I. Sobr. soch.: v 8 t. T. 3. M.: Choro, 1994. S. 214.
  9. Kassirer Eh. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. T. I: Yazyk. M.:: Universitetskaya kniga, 2002. S. 24.
  10. Kassirer Eh. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. T. II: Mifologicheskoe myshlenie. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2002.
  11. Levi-Stross K.Strukturnaya antropologiya. M., 1985. S. 186.
  12. Losskij N.O. "Mificheskoe" i sovremennoe nauchnoe myshlenie // Put'. 1928. № 14.
  13. Mamardashvili M. Lektsii po antichnoj filosofii. SPb.: Azbuka-Klassika, 2014. S. 17.
  14. Platon. Fileb // Platon. Sobranie sochinenij v 4 t. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 26.
  15. Semushkin A.V. Antinomizm Mifa i Logosa v genezise filosofskogo znaniya // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser.: Filosofiya. 2008. № 2. S. 63-64.
  16. Khajdegger M. Parmenid. SPb.: Vladimir Dal', 2009.
  17. Khajdegger M. Tsollikonovskie seminary. Vil'nyus: EGU, 2012. S. 56.
  18. Khajdegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? M., 2006. S. 155.
  19. Khyubner K.Istina mifa. M.: Respublika, 1996.
  20. Khyubner K. Progress ot mifa cherez logos k nauke kak teoretiko-poznavatel'naya problema // Razum i ehkzistentsiya: Analiz nauchnykh i vnena-uchnykh form myshleniya. SPb.: RKhGI, 1999. S. 118-119.
  21. Khyubner K.Filosofiya nauki i teologiya // Ehpistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2006. T. 10. № 4. S. 25.
  22. Shelling F.V. Filosofiya mifologii: v 2-kh t. T. 1. Vvedenie v filosofiyu mifologii. SPb.: S.-Peterb. un-t, 2013.
  23. Ehliade M. Aspekty mifa. M.: Invest-PPP, ST "PPP", 1996. S. 11.
  24. Ehliade M. Svyaschennoe i mirskoe. M.: MGU, 1994. S. 48.
  25. Yung K.G.K voprosu o podsoznanii // Yung K.G., fon Frants. M.-L., Khenderson Dzh.L., Yakobi I., Yaffe A. Chelovek i ego simvoly. M.: Med-kov S.B. Serebryanye niti, 2006.
  26. Yung K.G.Psikhologiya bessoznatel'nogo. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2010. S. 80.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate