Везде
Archaic cosmos and contemporary science
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Archaic cosmos and contemporary science
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000616-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Oksana Sedyh 
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
152-170
Abstract
For the first time comparative analysis of the work by the philosopher P. Florensky “Imaginaries in geometry” (1922) and “Einstein and religion” (1923) by ethnographer V. Bogoraz is carried out. These works were developed independently, the authors analyzing routes of the characters in literature and folklore draw conclusions about “non - classical” nature of the ancient cosmologies. The author of the article draws the problem of origin of literary plot and genre, in particular, the ritual - mythological hypothesis shared by P. Florensky and developed in the studies on folklore by V. Propp.
Keywords
THEORY OF RELATIVITY, IMAGINARY VALUES, REVERSE PERSPECTIVE, THE RITUAL-MYTHOLOGICAL HYPOTHESIS, THE MORPHOLOGY OF THE FAIRY TALES, RITUALS OF TRANSITION, THE SYMBOLS OF THE TRANSITION
Date of publication
01.12.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
987
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. M., 1993. S. 151
 2. Florenskij P.A. Mnimosti v geometrii. Rasshirenie oblasti dvukhmernykh obrazov geometrii (Opyt novogo istolkovaniya mnimostej). M., 1922. S. 47 
 3. Parshin A.N. Puteshestvie Dante v Ad: poehziya mifa i tochnost' estestvoznaniya//Florenskij P.A.: filosofiya, nauka, tekhnika. L., 1989. S.19 
 4. Bayuk D.A., Ford Ch.E. Dante -Galilej -Florenskij: apologiya zamknutogo kosmosa//Istoriko-matematicheskie issledovaniya, 2005. Vyp. 10 (45). S. 244-259. 
 5. Florenskij P.A. Obratnaya perspektiva//Filosofiya russkogo religioznogo iskusstva. M., 1993. S. 258 
 6. Andreev M.L. Vremya i vechnost' v “Bozhestvennoj Komedii”//Dantovskie chteniya. M., 1979. S. 159 
 7. Borkhes Kh.L. Devyat' ehsse o Dante//Voprosy filosofii, 1994. № 1. S. 146 
 8. Florenskij P.A. Iz bogoslovskogo naslediya//Bogoslovskie trudy, 1977. Sb. 17. S. 117 
 9. Trubetskoj E.N. Inoe tsarstvo i ego iskateli v russkoj narodnoj skazke. M., 1922. S. 8. 
 10. Tsiv'yan T.V. K semantike prostranstvennykh ehlementov v volshebnoj skazke (na materiale albanskoj skazki)//Tipologicheskie issledovaniya po fol'kloru. M., 1975. S. 212. 
 11. Parshin A.N. Puteshestvie Dante v Ad: poehziya mifa i tochnost' estestvoznaniya//Florenskij P.A.: filosofiya, nauka, tekhnika. L., 1989. S.19 
 12. Trubetskoj E.N. Inoe tsarstvo i ego iskateli v russkoj narodnoj skazke. M., 1922. S. 8 
 13. Tsiv'yan T.V. K semantike prostranstvennykh ehlementov v volshebnoj skazke (na materiale albanskoj skazki)//Tipologicheskie issledovaniya po fol'kloru. M., 1975. S. 210. 
 14. Florenskij P.A. Iz istorii neevklidovoj geometrii//Florenskij P.A. Soch. v 4 t. M., 1994-1999. T. 2. M., 1995. S. 630.
 15. Bogoraz V.G. Ehjnshtejn i religiya. M.-P., 1923. S. 53 
 16. Bogoraz V.G. Ehjnshtejn i religiya. M.-P., 1923. S. 15 
 17. Bogoraz V.G. Ehjnshtejn i religiya. M.-P., 1923. S. 10 
 18. Bogoraz V.G. Ehjnshtejn i religiya. M.-P., 1923. S. 30. 
 19. Bogoraz V.G. Ehjnshtejn i religiya. M.-P., 1923. S. 53. 
 20. Levi-Bryul' L. Pervobytnoe myshlenie//LeviBryul' L. Sverkh'estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. M., 1994, 1999. S. 62 
 21. Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa. M., 2001. S. 113
 22. Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa. M., 2001. S. 418
 23. Florenskij P.A. Obschechelovecheskie korni idealizma//Florenskij P.A. Soch. v 4 t. M., 1994-1999. T. 3 (2). M., 1995. S. 153
 24. Vdovin I.S. V.G. Bogoraz-Tan -uchenyj, pisatel', obschestvennyj deyatel'//Sovetskaya ehtnografiya, 1991. № 2. S. 88. 
 25. Polovinkin S.M. Real'nost' 1920-kh -1930-kh godov i “Mnimosti v geometrii” svyaschennika Pavla Florenskogo//Ehntelekhiya. 2000. № 2. S. 69

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate