Везде
How to think having done the unthinkable?
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
How to think having done the unthinkable?
Annotation
PII
S2072-07260000616-6-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Olga Zubets 
Edition
Volume 13 Issue 2
Pages
19-34
Abstract
The author analyses the trend and the tension of thought defined as “ethics after Auschwitz”, revealing the discredited character of morality in general, of moral language and ethical concepts, which leads to a conclusion that a philosopher can contemplate Auschwitz within the space of morality only as their own individual and responsible act, so that their personal subject’s perspective becomes the basis of moral philosophy. Thus, moral philosophy is understood in its opposition to ethics – a study of morality based on a perspective from the outside and on the analysis of morality represented in the norms and values of a society. The question of how moral philosophy after Auschwitz can be possible is a question about the possibility of thinking that is performed by a subject that takes responsibility for Auschwitz. This question unfolds into the double problem of the possibility of a kind of thinking that 1) negates (deprives of any roots in one’s own being) Auschwitz as the culmination of sociality and 2) itself requires a foundation that would exclude the participation of reason in Auschwitz as a culmination of violence, rationally justified and instrumentally supported by reason. The author finds a foundation for such thinking in the absolute prohibition of killing which is beyond the competence of reason and is not mediated by any moral norms or values. The way to negate Auschwitz as a so­ciality is to identify the moral subject of an act with the act itself. Eliminating any gap be­tween the moral subject and the act is eliminating any space that could be taken up by norms, values and knowledge, i.e. all those things that were engaged in the mechanics of Auschwitz. This can be seen as a philosophical answer to the main question: How can I negate Auschwitz and not collaborate with it? How can I avoid becoming Eichmann?
Keywords
ethics after Auschwitz, moral philosophy, Auschwitz, morality, thinking, un­thinkable, responsibility, act, subject
Date of publication
01.06.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
671
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S2072-07260000616-6-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 30.10.2020
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Adorno, T. Negativnaya dialektika [Negative Dialectics], trans. by E.L. Petrenko. Moscow: Nauchnyi mir Publ., 2003. 373 pp. (In Russian)
    2. 

  2. Agamben, G. Homo sacer. Chto ostaetsya posle Osventsima: arkhiv i svidetel’ [Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. Homo Sacer III], trans. by I. Levina, O. Dubickaja, P. Sokolov. Moscow: Europe Publ., 2012. 192 pp. (In Russian)
    3. 

  3. Arendt, H. “Nekotorye voprosy moral’noi filosofii” [Some Questions of Moral Philosophy], in: H. Arendt, Otvetstvennost’ i suzhdenie [Responsibility and Judgment], trans. by D. Aronson, S. Bardina, R. Gulyaev. Moscow: Institut Gaidara Publ., 2013, pp. 84‒203. (In Russian)
    4. 

  4. Badiou, A. Manifest filosofii [Manifesto for Philosophy], trans. by V.E. Lapitskii. St. Petersburg: Machina Publ., 2003. 184 pp. (In Russian)
    5. 

  5. Badiou, A. Obstoyatel’stva, 3: Napravlennosti slova ‘evrei’ [Circonstances, 3: The Uses of the Word ‘Jew’], trans. by M. Bendet. St. Petersburg: Akademiya issledovaniya kul’tury Publ., 2008, pp. 7‒104. (In Russian)
    6. 

  6. Bauman, Z. Aktual’nost' Kholokosta [Modernity and the Holocaust], trans. by S. Kastal’ski and M. Rudakov. Moscow: Europe Publ., 2013. 316 pp. (In Russian)
    7. 

  7. Bemporad, B., Pawlikowski, J.T. & Sievers, J. (eds.) Good and Evil After Auschwitz: Ethical Implications for Today. Hoboken, N.J.: KTAV Publ. House, 2000. 333 pp.
    8. 

  8. Bernstein, J.M. “Intact and Fragmented Bodies: Versions of Ethics ‘After Auschwitz’”, New German Critique, Vol. 33, No. 97 (1), 2006, pp. 31‒52.
    9. 

  9. Di Cesare, D. Utopia of understanding: between Babel and Auschwitz, trans. by N. Keane. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2012. 245 pp.
    10. 

  10. Fackenheim, E.L. “The Holocaust and Philosophy”, The Journal of Philosophy, 1985, Vol. LXXXII, No. 10, pp. 505‒514.
    11. 

  11. Fackenheim, E.L. To Mend the World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994. 359 pp.
    12. 

  12. Geddes, J.L., Roth, J.K. & Simon, J. (eds.) The Double Binds of Ethics after the Holocaust. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2009. 197 pp.
    13. 

  13. Guseynov, A.A. “Nravstvennaya filosofiya i etika: liniya razgranicheniya” [Moral Philosophy and Ethics: The Line of Demarcation], Eticheskaya mysl’ / Ethical Thought, 2019, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 5‒16. (In Russian)
    14. 

  14. Haas, P.J. Morality after Auschwitz: The Radical Challenge of the Nazi Ethic. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988. 257 pp.
    15. 

  15. Koonz, C. The Nazi Conscience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003. 368 pp.
    16. 

  16. Rees, L. The Holocaust. London: Penguin Random House, 2017. 599 pp.
    17. 

  17. Rees, L. Kholokost: Novaya istoriya [The Holocaust: A New History], trans. by S. Bavin. Moscow: KoLibri Publ.; Azbuka-Attikus Publ., 2019. 512 pp. (In Russian)
    18. 

  18. Roth, J.K. Ethics During and After the Holocaust: In the Shadow of Birkenau. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 225 pp.
    19. 

  19. Roth, J.K. The Failures of Ethics Confronting the Holocaust, Genocide, and Other Mass Atrocities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 277 pp.
    20. 

  20. Shestov, L. “Kirgegard i ekzistentsial’naya filosofiya” [Kierkegaard and the Existential Philosophy], in: L. Shestov, Apofeoz bespochvennosti [Apotheosis of Groundlessness]. Moscow: AST Publ., 2000, pp. 621‒809. (In Russian)
    21. 

  21. Tec, N. When Light Pierced the Darkness: Christian Rescue of Jews in Nazi-Occupied Poland. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. 262 pp.
    22. 

  22. Tolstoy, L.N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works], Vol. 11. Moscow: Khudozhest­vennaya literatura Publ, 1940. 466 pp. (In Russian)
    23. 

  23. Zubets, O.P. “Sud nad Eikhmanom: eticheskii vzglyad” [Eichmann Trial: An Ethical vision], Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava, 2019, No. 2, pp. 51‒61. (In Russian)
    24.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate