Везде
On the concepts of the “person” and “hypostasis” in the Russian XX century religious philosophy
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
On the concepts of the “person” and “hypostasis” in the Russian XX century religious philosophy
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000616-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Hieromonk Methody (Zinkovskiy) 
Edition
Issue 2
Pages
123-137
Abstract
The ideas related to the «person» or «hypostasis» by three Russian philosophers of the Silver age are presented. Each one uses the concepts of patristic theology in his own way. Many of the provisions of those philosophers, especially the opposition between “the hypostasis” (or “the person”) and “the individual” in the context of aviological, and sometimes ontological, priority of the first, became a distinctive feature of Orthodox personalism of the ХХ century. The merit of the philosophers’ thoughts is the fact that they have prompted many Orthodox thinkers, including V. N. Lossky, to refer to the patristic heritage in their search of answers to the questions raised in their compositions.
Keywords
HYPOSTASIS, PERSON, ENTITY, INDIVIDUAL, PERSONALISM, PATRISTIC THEOLOGY
Date of publication
01.04.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1193
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Antologiya vostochno-khristianskoj bogoslovskoj mysli. Ortodoksiya i geterodoksiya. V 2-kh t. / Pod nauch. red. G.I. Benevicha i D.S. Biryukova. Sost. G.I. Benevich. M.; SPb.: Nikeya - RKhGA, 2009. T. 1.
    2. 

  2. Benevich G.I. Mat' Mariya. Dukhovnaya biografiya i tvorchestvo. SPb.: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola, 2003. Ierom. Mefodij (Zinkovskij) O ponyatiyakh “lichnost'” i “ipostas'”.
    3. 

  3. Benevich G.I. Prp. Maksim Ispovednik v Rossii // Prp. Maksim Ispovednik. Bogoslovsko-polemicheskie sochineniya / Per. D.A. Chernoglazova i A. M. Shufrina. Afon, SPb.: izd. RKhGA, 2014. S. 679-706.
    4. 

  4. Berdyaev N.A. O naznachenii cheloveka. M., 1993.
    5. 

  5. Berdyaev N.A. O rabstve i svobode cheloveka. Opyt ehskhatologicheskoj metafiziki // Tsarstvo Dukha i Tsarstvo Kesarya / Sost. P.V. Alekseev M.: Respublika, 1995.
    6. 

  6. Berdyaev N.A. Samopoznanie. M.: Mir knigi, 2010.
    7. 

  7. Berdyaev N.A. "Ya" i mir ob'ektov // Ego zhe. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. M.: Respublika, 1994.
    8. 

  8. Bulgakov S., prot. Agnets Bozhij. Parizh: YMCA PRESS, 1933.
    9. 

  9. Bulgakov S., prot. Ipostas' i ipostasnost' // Ego zhe. Trudy o troichnosti. M., 2001. S. 19-52.
    10. 

  10. Bulgakov S., prot. Trudy o troichnosti. M., 2001.
    11. 

  11. Bulgakov S., prot. Uteshitel'. M., 2003.
    12. 

  12. Epifanij Kiprskij, svt. Panarion // Tvoreniya sv. Epifaniya Kiprskogo. V 6-ti chastyakh. M.: tip. V. Got'e, 1862-1884. Ch. 5.
    13. 

  13. Zhaba S. Za drugi svoya // Vestnik R. Kh. D. 1980. № 131. S. 325-341.
    14. 

  14. Zen'kovskij V., prot. Istoriya russkoj filosofii. V 2-kh t. Leningrad: Ehgo, 1991. T. II. Ch. 2.
    15. 

  15. Losskij V.N.Spor o Sofii. Stat'i raznykh let. M., 1996.
    16. 

  16. Losskij N.O. Istoriya russkoj filosofii. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1991.
    17. 

  17. Fedotov G.P.Berdyaev - myslitel' // Berdyaev N.A. Samopoznanie. M.: Kniga, 1991. S. 395-408.
    18. 

  18. Florenskij P., svyasch. Deduktsiya semi tainstv (iz bogoslovskogo naslediya) // Bogoslovskie trudy. M., 1977. T. 17. S. 143-147.
    19. 

  19. Florenskij P., svyasch. Filosofiya kul'ta. Opyt pravoslavnoj antropoditsei. M.: Mysl', 2004. (Filosofskoe nasledie. T. 133).
    20. 

  20. Farrow D. Person and Nature: The Necessity-Freedom Dialectic in John Zizioulas // Knight D.H. (ed.). The Theology of John Zizioulas. Personhood and the Church. Ashgate, 2007. P. 109-124, here: p. 110.
    21. 

  21. Plato. Alcibiades i // J. Burnet. Platonis opera. Vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1901 (repr. 1967). St II.103 a - 135 c (TLG).
    22. 

  22. Zizioulas Jh.D. Being as Communion: Studies in Personhood and the Church. Crestwood; New York: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1993. P. 133.
    23.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate