Везде
Towards the place of a Human being in the animal kingdom
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Towards the place of a Human being in the animal kingdom
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000392-2-1
DOI
10.31857/S70000392-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Evgeniy Tetushkin 
Edition
Issue 2
Pages
5-25
Abstract
The problem of the unique phenomic and genomic characteristics of a Human being is considered. The charts illustrating the phylogenetic systematics of hominids and the position of a Human being in the taxonomic hierarchy of the animal kingdom are presented. The evolutionary and genetic mechanisms that shaped the modern type people are discussed. Special attention is paid to neoteny and self-domestication of Humans. The materials of comparative genomics giving evidence of the uniqueness of the structural and functional characteristics of Human genomes are analyzed. The prospects of the development of a unified science of man predicted by K. Marx are outlined.
Keywords
HUMAN NATURE, SYSTEMATICS OF HOMININS, MOLECULAR ANTHROPOLOGY, NEOTENY, SELF-DOMESTICATION OF HUMANS, ANTHROPOGENY, BIOLOGY AND CULTURE, THE UNIQUENESS OF MAN,
Number of purchasers
8
Views
1065
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Dubinin N.P. Chto takoe chelovek. M.: Mysl', 1983.
    2. 

  2. Tetushkin E.Ya. Suschestvuyut li rasy Cheloveka? // Chelovek. 2015. № 1. S. 5-31.
    3. 

  3. Tetushkin E.Ya. Geny zabytykh predkov (razmyshleniya o genealogii, genetike i lichnostnoj identichnosti, chast' I) // Chelovek. 2016. № 6. S. 18-32.
    4. 

  4. Tetushkin E.Ya. Geny zabytykh predkov (razmyshleniya o genealogii, genetike i lichnostnoj identichnosti, chast' II) // Chelovek. 2017. № 1. S. 5-21.
    5. 

  5. Fridman Eh.P. Primaty. M.: Nauka, 1979.
    6. 

  6. Khofrajter M. Ehvolyutsiya cheloveka // Genetika cheloveka po Fogelyu i Motulski. Problemy i podkhody. Red. Spejcher M.R., Antonorakis S.E., Motulski A.G. Per. s angl. Latypov A.Sh. i dr., nauchn. red. Baranov V.S. SPb: Izd-vo N-L, 2013.
    7. 

  7. Antrosio J., 2012. Anthropology and Human Nature. Living Anthropologically, URL: http://www.livinganthropologically.com/anthropology/ human-nature/. Last updated 31 July 2012.
    8. 

  8. Barrett H.C. Diversity and hierarchy in the evolution of mental mechanisms // On Human Nature: Biology, Psychology, Ethics, Politics, and Religion. Tibayrenc M., Ayala F.J. (eds). Amsterdam et al.: Academic Press, Elsevier, 2017. P. 467-474.
    9. 

  9. Bogin B. Childhood, adolescence, and longevity: a multilevel model of the evolution of reserve capacity in human life history // Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2009. Vol. 21. P. 567-577.
    10. 

  10. Bufill E., Agusti J., Blesa R Human neoteny revisited: The case of synaptic plasticity // Amer. J. Hum. Biol. 2011. Vol. 23. P. 729-739.
    11. 

  11. Carroll S.B. Genetics and the making of Homo sapiens // Nature. 2003. Vol. 422, P. 849-857.
    12. 

  12. Cieri R.L., Churchill S.E., Franciscus R.G. et al. Craniofacial femi-nization, social Tolerance, and the origins of behavioral modernity // Current Anthropology. 2014. Vol. 55. P. 419-443.
    13. 

  13. Cela-Conde C.J., Ayala F.J. The Advent of biological evolution and humankind: Chance or necessity? // On Human Nature: Biology, Psychology, Ethics, Politics, and Religion. Tibayrenc M., Ayala F.J. (eds). Amsterdam et al.: Academic Press, Elsevier, 2017. P. 3-15.
    14. 

  14. Gibbons A. How we tamed ourselves - and became modern: 'Self-domestication' turned humans into the cooperative species we are today // Science. 2014. Vol. 346. P. 405-406.
    15. 

  15. Gilead A. Neoteny and the playground of pure possibilities // Int. J. Humanities and Social Science. 2015. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 30-39.
    16. 

  16. Godfrey L.R., Sautherland M.R. Paradox of peramorphic paedomor-phosis: Heterochrony and human evolution // Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop. 1996. Vol. 99. P. 17-42.
    17. 

  17. Goodman M., Tagle D.A., Fitch D.H.A. et al. Primate evolution at the DNA level and a classification of hominoids // J. Mol. Evol. 1990. Vol. 30. P. 260-266.
    18. 

  18. Gould S.J. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.
    19. 

  19. Gould S.J., Lewontin R.C. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme // Proc. R. Soc. London B. 1979. Vol. 205. P. 581-598. Est' russkij perevod s primechaniyami: URL: http://www.socialcompas.com/2015/08/12/pazuhi-svoda-sobora-svyatogo-marka-i-paradigma-panglossa-kritika-adaptatsionistskoj-pro-grammy
    20. 

  20. Gould S.J. The exaptive excellence of spandrels as a term and prototype // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997. Vol. 94, P. 10750-10755.
    21. 

  21. Gould S.J., Vrba E.S. Exaptation, a missing term in the science of form // Palaeobiology. 1982. Vol. 8. P. 4-15.
    22. 

  22. Gualandi A. Stephen J. Gould, between humanism and anti-humanism. Neoteny, exaptation and human sciences // In: Danieli G. A. et al. (eds.), Stephen J. Gould: The Scientific Legacy. Milan et al.: Springer, 2013. P. 187-199.
    23. 

  23. Jobling M. et al. Human evolutionary genetics. 2nd ed. N.Y, London: Garland Science, 2014.
    24. 

  24. O'Bleness M., Searles V.B., Varki A. et al. Evolution of genetic and genomic features unique to the human lineage // Nature Rev. Genetics. 2012. Vol. 13. P. 853-866.
    25. 

  25. Racimo F., Sankararaman S., Nielsen R., JJuerta-Sanchez E. Evidence for archaic adaptive introgression in humans // Nature Rev. Genet. 2015. Vol. 16. P. 359-371. Sm. kommentarij Paabo S. The diverse origins of the human gene pool // ibid., p. 313-314.
    26. 

  26. Shea B.T. Heterochrony in human evolution: The case for neoteny reconsidered // Yearbook Phys. Anthrop. 1989. Vol. 32. P. 69-101.
    27. 

  27. Sholtis S.J., Noonan J.P. Gene regulation and the origins of human biological uniqueness // Trends in Genetics. 2010. Vol. 26. No. 3. P. 110-118.
    28. 

  28. Skulachev V.P., Holtze S., Vyssokikh M.Y. et al. Neoteny, prolongation of youth: from naked mole rats to "naked apes" (humans). // Physiol. Rev. 2017. Vol. 97. P. 699-720. Sm. interv'yu V.P. Skulacheva "Po programme krotokrysa" v ezhenedel'nike "Poisk" za 18 noyabrya 2016 (№ 46). S. 15.
    29. 

  29. Somel M., Franz H., Yana Z. et al. Transcriptional neoteny in the human brain // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009. Vol. 106. P. 5743-5748.
    30. 

  30. Somel M., Tang L., Khaitovich P. The role of neoteny in human evolution: From genes to the phenotype // In: Post-Genome Biology of Primates. Hirai H. et al. (eds). Tokyo et al.: Springer, 2012. P. 23-41.
    31. 

  31. URL: https://carta.anthropogeny.org/moca/about
    32. 

  32. URL: http://w3.salemstate.edu/~hbenne/pdfs/reflections.pdf
    33. 

  33. Varki A., Gagneux P. How different are humans and "great apes"? A matrix of comparative anthropogeny // On Human Nature: Biology, Psychology, Ethics, Politics, and Religion. Tibayrenc M., Ayala F.J. (eds). Amsterdam et al.: Academic Press, Elsevier, 2017. P. 151-160.
    34. 

  34. Wilkins A.S., Wrangham R.W., Fitch W.T. The "domestication syndrome" in mammals: A unified explanation based on neural crest cell behavior and Genetics // Genetics. 2014. Vol. 197. P. 795-808.
    35. 

  35. Wilson E.O. Foreword // On Human Nature: Biology, Psychology, Ethics, Politics, and Religion. Tibayrenc M., Ayala F.J. (eds). Amsterdam et al.: Academic Press, Elsevier, 2017. P. xxi. E. Tetushkin O meste cheloveka v tsarstve zhivotnykh
    36.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate