Везде
Is the philosophy of history needed today?
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Is the philosophy of history needed today?
Annotation
PII
S023620070002970-4-1
DOI
10.31857/S023620070002346-7
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vladimir Krzhevov 
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of Social Philosophy and Philosophy of History
Affiliation: Moscow State University Lomonosov
Address: Russian Federation
Vadim Mezhuev
Occupation: Chief Researcher, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of Philosophy RAS
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
69-97
Abstract

The discussion focuses on the place and role of the philosophy of history in contemporary historical knowledge. Unlike most of the modern works, it covers not only the methodological and epistemological functions of the philosophy of history but its significance as a special type of ontological knowledge of history. That knowledge allows us to represent the philosophy of history in the perspective of the unity of all the three principal temporal modes, that are the Past, the Present, and the Future. That link of times within the general historical dynamics is manifested in their different correlation with the nontemporal world, or eternity, that is symbolically framed in mythological, religious and utopian consciousness. The very necessity of relating historical time to such an unverifiable category as eternity gives the philosophy of history a special status of ontological knowledge of history. The comprehension of world history in the unity of all its time modes is possible neither through the opposition of time and eternity — that opposition is characteristic for the historical Past, nor as a denial of a religiously or metaphysically interpreted eternity in the modern era, but as a result of interpreting the future as a historical state in which the gap between time and eternity.

Keywords
freedom, necessity, philosophy of history, truth, social reproduction
Received
24.08.2018
Date of publication
07.12.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
1447
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf
1

References

1. Anokhin P.K. Filosofskie aspekty teorii funktsional'noj sistemy. M.: Nauka, 1978.

2. Berdyaev N.A. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M.: Mysl', 1990.

3. Gegel' G.F.V. Filosofiya istorii // Soch. T. 8. M.4L.: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no4ehkonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo, 1935.

4. Demin I.V. Filosofiya istorii v postmetafizicheskom kontekste. Samara: Samarskaya gumanitarnaya akademiya, 2015.

5. Il'in V.V. Filosofiya istorii. M.: Izd4vo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2003.

6. Kant I. Ideya vseobschej istorii vo vsemirno-grazhdanskom plane // Sochineniya: V 6 t. T. 6. M.: Mysl', 1966. S. 6–23.

7. Kant I. Kritika prakticheskogo razuma // Sochineniya: V 6 t. T. 4. Ch. 1, 2. M.: Mysl', 1965.

8. Lem S. Molokh. M.: AST, Tranzitkniga, 2006.

9. Lem S. Summa tekhnologii. M.: Mir,1968.

10. Loone Eh. Sovremennaya filosofiya istorii. Talinn: Ehehsti raamat, 1980.

11. Losev A.F. Antichnaya filosofiya istorii. M.: Nauka, 1977.

12. Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poryadok iz khaosa. M.: Progress, 1986.

13. Semenov Yu.I. Filosofiya istorii. M.: Sovremennye tetradi, 2003.

14. Trel'ch Eh. Istorizm i ego problemy. Logicheskaya problema filosofii istorii. M.: Yurist, 1994.

15. Filosofiya istorii / Pod red. A.S. Panarina. M.: Gardariki, 2001.

16. Shpet G.G. Ocherk razvitiya russkoj filosofii. M.: ROSSPEhN, 2008.

17. Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M.: Politicheskaya literatura, 1991

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate