<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Chelovek</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Chelovek</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0236-2007</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2782-2893</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Russian Academy of Science</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi"></article-id><title-group><article-title>Whether the author is really buried</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Так похоронен ли автор?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid"></contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kolesnikov</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Колесников</surname><given-names>С. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>skolesnikov2015@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru"></institution><institution xml:lang="en"></institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2016-08-01" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>08</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><fpage>132</fpage><lpage>145</lpage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article considers various aspects of the conception of “the death of the author”. The content of major literary and philosophical categories emphasizing the incompleteness and inconsistency of the conception “death of the author” is deliberated. Inappropriateness of application of the “death of the author” conception to a real literary process is demonstrated.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Рассматриваются различные аспекты концепции “смерти автора”, анализируется содержание основных литературоведческих и философских категорий, которые подчеркивают неполноту и противоречивость данной концепции. Выстраивается линия аргументации, доказывающая неправомерность применения концепции “смерти автора” к реальному литературному процессу.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>R. BART</kwd><kwd>J. KRISTEVA</kwd><kwd>DEATH OF THE AUTHOR</kwd><kwd>POSTSTRUCTURALISM</kwd><kwd>POSTMODERNISM</kwd><kwd>LITERARY CRITICISM</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Р. БАРТ</kwd><kwd>Ю. КРИСТЕВА</kwd><kwd>СМЕРТЬ АВТОРА</kwd><kwd>ПОСТСТРУКТУРАЛИЗМ</kwd><kwd>ПОСТМОДЕРНИЗМ</kwd><kwd>ЛИТЕРАТУРОВЕДЕНИЕ</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list></ref-list></back></article>