Freudian discourse and the problem of the object
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Freudian discourse and the problem of the object
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000616-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
71-80
Abstract
The sructuralistic ban to speak of the things of which “one cannot speak clearly” as well as traditional dichotomy of the subject and the object result in some principal cognitive limitations. But to remove this ban and dichotomy in the framework of some effective methods is not an easy task. The author demonstrates that depth psychology and Freudian philosphizing in whole provide the way to solve this problem and to remove some basic limitations.
Keywords
PARADIGM, DISCOURSE, FREUD, DELEUZE, PSYCHOANALYSIS, VITGENSTEIN, RHIZOME
Date of publication
01.12.2012
Number of purchasers
1
Views
958
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Vitgenshtejn L. Filosofskie raboty. Ch. 1. M., 1994. 
2. Fuko M. Nadzirat' i nakazyvat'. Rozhdenie tyur'my. M., 1999.
3. Flek L. Vozniknovenie i razvitie nauchnogo fakta: Vvedenie v teoriyu stilya myshleniya i myslitel'nogo kollektiva. M., 1999.
4. Episkop Arsenij. Svyatago Grigoriya Palamy, mitropolita Solunskago, Tri tvoreniya, dosele ne byvshie izdannymi. Novgorod, 1893
5. Pamyatniki vizantijskoj literatury 9-14 vv. M., 1969. S. 366-374.
6. Frejd Z. Po tu storonu printsipa udovol'stviya. M., 1992. S. 251-256.
7. Delez Zh., Gvatari F. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Anti Ehdip. M., 1990
8. Flem L. Povsednevnaya zhizn' Frejda i ego patsientov. M., 2003 S. 63-68.
9. Bart R. Semi otika. Poehtika. M., 1994.
10. Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsij (Ocherki o germenevtike). M., 2008.
11. Frejd Z. Vvedeniya v psikhoanaliz. Lektsii. M., 1991. S. 29.
12. Ginzburg K. Primety: ulikovaya paradigma i ee korni. // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 1994. № 8. S. 51.
13. Dragunskaya L. Psikhoanaliz kak antropologicheskij proekt // Chelovek. 2000. № 4.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate